Futures |  Weather |  Grain |  Market News |  DTN Ag Headlines |  US Ag News |  Headline News |  Portfolio |  Livestock |  Options 
     
  Home  
  UC Story  
  Feed  
  Grain  
  Agronomy  
  Propane  
  Fuel  
  Lubricants  
  Cenex/Retail  
  Cash Bids  
  Locations  
  Trucking  
  Ethanol  
  Newsletter  
  Careers  
  News  
  Community giving  
  What is a cooperative?  
  Links  
  Contact Us  

 
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
Israeli PM Fighting Iran Nuke Deal     02/27 06:32

   Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu heads to Washington next week on a 
last-gasp effort to seal what he hopes will become his signature achievement: 
preventing Iran from attaining a nuclear weapon. But the centerpiece of the 
visit, a much-hyped speech to Congress arguing against the international 
community's emerging nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic, has been 
overshadowed by a damaging battle with the White House and electoral intrigue 
back home.

   JERUSALEM (AP) -- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu heads to 
Washington next week on a last-gasp effort to seal what he hopes will become 
his signature achievement: preventing Iran from attaining a nuclear weapon. But 
the centerpiece of the visit, a much-hyped speech to Congress arguing against 
the international community's emerging nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic, 
has been overshadowed by a damaging battle with the White House and electoral 
intrigue back home.

   By accepting a back-door invitation from House Speaker John Boehner that 
bypassed the White House, Netanyahu has inserted himself into the heart of the 
bitter U.S. partisan divide and seen his already troubled relations with 
President Barack Obama's administration reach a new low. In exceptionally harsh 
language, the U.S. national security adviser, Susan Rice, has called the speech 
"destructive."

   At home, Netanyahu is being accused of cynically turning the speech into a 
campaign stop ahead of March 17 elections, insisting on confronting Obama to 
distract from scandals and domestic issues dogging his re-election bid. The 
uproar has even pushed aside debate over his key argument that Iran's nuclear 
weapons-making capabilities will be left largely intact.

   The Israeli media and political opponents have lambasted the decision to 
flout the White House, and even some allies who support Netanyahu's message 
have criticized the approach.

   The U.S. administration is refusing to meet with him and appears to be 
considering ways of undercutting him. The White House has already said it is 
scaling back on the intelligence it typically shares with Israel, some 
pro-Israel Democrats are skipping his speech and Jewish American groups have 
spoken out against the visit.

   Undeterred, Netanyahu plans to proceed with his speech to Congress Tuesday, 
and this week he accused the U.S. and other global powers of "giving up" on 
their commitment to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

   "I respect the president of the United States, but in such a fateful matter 
that can determine if we exist or not, it is my duty to do everything to 
prevent this great danger to the state of Israel," he said.

   Yuval Steinitz, Israel's minister for intelligence affairs and a close 
confidant of Netanyahu's, said the prime minister considers stopping Iran a 
"historic mission."

   "He really believes that this is his No. 1 mission, his No. 1 obligation and 
priority," he told The Associated Press. "For Netanyahu it is in his bones."

   Netanyahu has been warning the world for more than a decade about dangers of 
a nuclear-armed Iran, citing the Islamic Republic's support for some of the 
most dangerous militant groups and regimes across the region, its development 
of long-range missiles and its development of a nuclear infrastructure that 
includes thousands of centrifuges capable of enriching uranium to weapons-grade 
levels. With Iranian leaders frequently calling for the destruction of Israel, 
Netanyahu considers a nuclear-armed Iran a threat to his country's very 
existence.

   Iran has argued that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only. That 
argument has not convinced many governments. But Netanyahu's campaign to get 
the world not to compromise at all seems like a tough sell at such a late stage 
after years of talks.

   While the U.S. and Iran are negotiating over how many thousands of 
centrifuges Iran will be allowed to keep, Israel says it should not be granted 
a single one, claiming they are not needed if the program really is for 
peaceful purposes. Enriched uranium has both civilian and military uses.

   Steinitz said Iran has shown little flexibility in the negotiations, and 
rejected the international approach of "containing" Iran by easing sanctions in 
return for good behavior. Instead, he said Iran's military capabilities needed 
to be neutralized, meaning no uranium enrichment.

   Israel is not alone. Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations are also 
wary of a deal that could set off a Middle East arms race. With Iran's 
influence already spread across Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen, a 
favorable deal could bolster its already considerable ambitions across the 
region.

   But given Israel's unique concerns, Netanyahu has led the charge, and he 
sees Congress as perhaps his last chance to block a deal.

   Netanyahu's political opponents share his concerns, but accuse him of 
hurting his case by clashing with Obama. Many claim he uses the Iran issue to 
obscure issues from the election agenda where he is more vulnerable, such as 
Israel's economic inequalities, sky-high housing costs and scandals regarding 
his homes' inflated expenses.

   The March 3 speech comes just two weeks before Israelis vote and less than a 
month before the deadline for a framework agreement with Iran.

   David Horovitz, the founding editor of the moderate Times of Israel website, 
recently summed up the Israeli mood with an essay titled "divided over that 
speech, not over a lousy deal with Iran."

   Netanyahu and Obama, who both took office in early 2009, have suffered from 
poor chemistry from the beginning and had a series of run-ins over Iran, 
Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts and Israeli settlement construction.

   The latest spat, however, appears to have sunk U.S.-Israeli ties to their 
lowest point since Secretary of State James Baker famously told Israel in 1990, 
"When you are serious about peace, call us." Netanyahu has tried to brush off 
the latest tensions as a disagreement between friends.

   U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told a congressional hearing this week 
that Netanyahu "may have a judgment that just may not be correct here," while 
National Security Adviser Susan Rice said the Israeli leader had injected 
partisanship into a relationship that should be above politics.

   "It's destructive to the fabric of the relationship," Rice said.

   Dov Weisglass, a top aide to former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, warned that 
Israel may find the U.S. no longer assisting next time it found itself in 
conflict with hostile world organizations.

   With Netanyahu's position so well known, it remains unclear what exactly he 
hopes to gain from another speech. He gave a similar and well-received address 
to Congress in 2011.

   Dore Gold, a top Netanyahu adviser, said that even if the prime minister 
can't change Obama's mind, it was the prime minister's duty to "clarify to the 
widest possible audience what the danger is." He said the disagreements were 
part of a healthy global public discourse over a critical issue.

   "The U.S. is committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and 
therefore the debate is about how best to prevent that from happening," he 
said. "(We) think the discourse has been created and we're hopeful it will lead 
to a new understanding of how to halt Iran."


(KA)


 
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN